April 9th, 2009

Catastrophe Risk Management Options for the Smaller Insurance Company

Posted at 12:00 PM ET

rains_david_bioDavid Rains, FSA, MAAA — Managing Director and Head of the Life, Accident and Health Specialty Practice, Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC

Every life insurer is exposed to catastrophe risk. The largest carriers, of course, tend to have the capital on hand to absorb substantial losses and can rely on economies of scale to make reinsurance more affordable. Smaller life insurers, on the other hand, do not always have the same risk management tools available at a proportionate cost. Thus, they may feel forced to retain risks which, if realized, could imperil solvency. Fortunately, there are products on the market that make cover attainable for smaller life insurers.

Catastrophe risk poses a unique challenge for smaller life insurers. By virtue of a smaller portfolio of insureds, the probability of high losses from a given catastrophe is less than that for a larger carrier with broad market penetration. However, in specific markets or affinity groups, the relative probability of a catastrophic loss could be even greater for a small insurer that is very effective in that niche. Smaller average face amounts may create a smaller loss in absolute terms — though quite significant in relative terms, considered against a smaller balance sheet and available surplus. The threat is real.

Traditional reinsurance can be effective for mitigation, though in many cases, cedents see this as reinsuring too much profit and expense margin along with the risk. Yet, without coverage, one event could severely impair an insurer’s balance sheet, so some protection is necessary. Smaller insurers have more options than they may realize. Several products are at their disposal, which can help them protect their capital without impairing profitability unnecessarily.

Variations on basic life catastrophe cover — which involve a minimum of three lives in a single event — do exist for smaller carriers. The coverage pays if losses exceed a particular attachment point, and recovery is governed by a specified limit and Maximum Any One Life (MAOL) amount, as well as a limited timeframe within which the losses occur (i.e., “hours clauses”). Pricing is generally quoted as a “rate on line” (ROL) and is a percentage of the specified limit. A “3 million XS 1 million” treaty, for example, attaches at a catastrophe loss of USD1 million and has a limit of USD3 million. At an ROL of 3 percent, it would cost USD90,000 (i.e., 0.03 X USD3 million).

Life catastrophe cover is available from markets in Bermuda and London and can provide coverage for deaths from natural disasters, accidents and terrorism. Terrorism may include nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) protection for a surcharge. Pricing for life catastrophe reinsurance spiked following the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

Though prices have come down considerably, the cost is not likely to return to prior levels.


Depending on the key risks identified, limited catastrophe products may be more affordable options. A common example would be coverage for catastrophes affecting specific buildings — useful if your primary catastrophe exposure is highly concentrated in the home office, a key agency or a large client. Another would be common carrier coverage, preferred where benefits may be multiples of base coverage and the key risks are multiple deaths from airplane accidents.

Accidental death carve-out (ADCO) reinsurance manages exposure to all accidental death volatility. The coverage is, essentially, a fixed-for-floating mortality swap: the cedent pays the expected accidental death claims plus a risk margin to the reinsurer and the reinsurer reimburses the cedent for actual accidental death claims — including death claims due to accident for any type of underlying policy. By definition, this form of cover includes catastrophe losses for all causes (including NBC terror), and unlimited recovery treaties are widely available (though some reinsurers will impose limits). This approach, which is offered for single- and multi-year periods, can make catastrophe cover more valuable by smoothing accidental death claim volatility by including recoveries in high loss, non-catastrophe years.

Given that cost is among the principal concerns of smaller life carriers in regards to managing the risk of a remote event (that they have likely never experienced), a certain degree of coverage flexibility is necessary. With ADCO, cedents can include deductibles of up to 100 percent of expected claims. In conjunction with the possibility of multi-year cover and the fact that claims may not be capped, smaller life insurers have the ability to structure their protection in a way that balances cost, the need for catastrophe cover, and the added benefit of reducing volatility.

In addition to indemnity contracts with reinsurers, smaller life cedents can also join risk-sharing pools. Special Pooled Risk Administrators (SPRA), managed by Swiss Re, operates risk pools for both individual and group life policies. Though complex formulas define deductibles and shares, the operation of the pool is relatively straightforward. After deductibles, claims are shared in proportion with each company’s participation percentage. If a company’s proportion of the loss is greater than their participation percentage, they receive benefits.

For ordinary life, SPRA includes 15 participants representing 30 companies, but this is shrinking. Ten years ago, it had 100 participants, and five years ago, it dropped to 50. Despite the low cost up front, lack of annual limit on claims, and full terrorism cover (including NBC), the total cost to the cedent can include assessments (and, just as there is no limit on the annual number of claims, there is no limit on the annual number of assessments). Thus, every member is a potential payer or reinsurer, as well as a beneficiary or cedent, depending on its share of a loss relative to other members of the SPRA pool.

The Shared Adverse Fluctuation Experience (SAFE) pool is another pooled risk resource for life insurers. Similar to SPRA, it provides a low-cost, low-risk alternative to reinsurance, but focused on companies that do not have large insurance concentrations in major metropolitan areas. The deductible applied is the lesser of three times a carrier’s retention or 12 times its average policy size. The pool is small, with 13 life insurance companies (seven corporate groups) and approximately USD89 billion of net retained life risk. Limits are approximately USD18 million, and four deaths are required to qualify an event as a catastrophe, as opposed to the usual threshold of three.

The decision to secure life catastrophe coverage should be driven by exposure and risk management strategy — reflecting cost as an important consideration but not the sole driver. A smaller life insurer has an obligation, just as larger firms do, to first understand its exposure and then make any risk transfer decisions based on risk tolerance thresholds and financial objectives. Retaining risks outside of defined tolerance thresholds is no longer the only option. The products exist to facilitate informed, cost-effective risk and capital management decision-making that is aligned with the intricacies of a portfolio’s specific risks, no matter the size.


Additional Contributor:

  • James Eggert, Senior Vice President, Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC
AddThis Feed Button
Bookmark and Share

Related Posts