Part I: Clashing and Catastrophic Events: Remoteness has been used to downplay the threat, causing carriers to overlook a more immediate, though less menacing, concern. A substantial loss may not imperil company operations, but it could lead to an unexpected earnings hit, the effects of which would be magnified for shareholders. Unanticipated large losses typically result in a disproportionate impact on market capitalization. Casualty clash and catastrophe protection, consequently, can be a vital tool in managing overall financial performance.
Part II: Age of Casualty Catastrophe Risks: The global financial crisis that has unleashed havoc on credit and equity markets is the most recent casualty catastrophe (with both systemic and classic clash characteristics), and it may be the largest in recent memory … but it certainly isn’t the first. In fact, there have been many, and their frequency has increased over the past two decades, allowing financial markets little reprieve from one disaster to the next.
Part III: Renewed Interest in Casualty Clash Reinsurance: Perhaps because of market conditions last year — and a general increase in awareness — larger insurers paid more attention to casualty clash and catastrophe risk at the Jan. 1, 2009, reinsurance renewal. This followed several years in which they did not secure much protection. Even with the increase in interest in this form of cover, capacity was adequate, and pricing remained stable. Historically, product availability, terms and pricing prevented the widespread purchase of protection. Since many of these cedents now have larger net lines on their portfolios — and plenty of available reinsurance capacity — they are beginning to secure the protection they need. Changes in capital availability and terms have helped cedents.
Part IV: Casualty Clash and Catastrophe Renaissance: We are surrounded by casualty clash and catastrophe risk. Especially in today’s interconnected and turbulent business environment, these threats can pervade a large insurer’s portfolio, imperiling balance sheet strength and shareholder returns. For the past 20 years, we have seen the rapid escalation of casualty clash and catastrophe risk, and the trend is unlikely to abate. If anything, it will gather more momentum. Consequently, we may be on the brink of a casualty clash and catastrophe renaissance, to be fueled by the capital management agendas of large casualty writers that need to address a lingering, concealed exposure that has long been elusive.