Archive for April, 2010



April 21st, 2010

Chart: Update on April 1 Reinsurance Renewals, US Property Catastrophe: Market Quoting Behavior, Quotes by Market Segment

Posted at 9:00 AM ET
Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC has performed further analyses based on the availability of more quoting detail:
  • Against a smaller number of renewal transactions at April 1 we observed the UK becoming more aggressive and the Bermuda market less aggressive in the Gulf region relative to their respective positions at January 1.

Microsoft PowerPoint - Property Specialty Update redo.ppt [Read-

 

  • Across all regions, the UK was the most competitive quoting market on average, but with greater intra-market volatility than other markets.
  • At April 1 we saw significant quote consistency on National renewals, but relative to January 1 the quote volatility increased in both the Northeast and Gulf zones. Again, this may be attributable to reinsurers positioning their regional portfolios more actively in the context of business they wrote, or didn’t write, at January 1.

Click here to view additional materials on the April 1, 2010 Renewal >>

Click here to register for e-mail updates >>

April 20th, 2010

GC ForeCat™ Continues to Predict Above-Average Hurricane Landfall Rates in Northeast and Florida Regions for 2010 Season

Posted at 12:10 PM ET

forecat-20-april-small1GC ForeCat is a product developed by Guy Carpenter in collaboration with WSI Corporation, the world’s leading provider of weather-driven business solutions, that provides pre-season hurricane landfall forecast rates for different regions in the United States. GC ForeCat revolutionises hurricane forecasting by estimating the rate of landfall for regions along the U.S. coastline. Four different regions (Gulf, Florida, Southeast and Northeast - see Figure 1) are derived with associated likelihood of tropical cyclones making landfall in each area. Monthly updates are anticipated up to and including May.

Continue reading…

April 20th, 2010

Chart: Update on April 1 Reinsurance Renewals, US Property Catastrophe: Market Quoting Behavior, Increased Variation in Quotes

Posted at 9:00 AM ET

Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC has performed further analyses based on the availability of more quoting detail:

  • We have found increased variation from January 1 renewals in reinsurer quotations across all regions, but the range remained consistent at down by 11 percent to up by 11 percent.
  • Broader quote variation is expected as reinsurers position their portfolios more actively in the wake of January 1 renewal results.

market-quite-big-4_10

Click here to view additional materials on the April 1, 2010 Renewal >>

Click here to register for e-mail updates >>

April 19th, 2010

Micro Risk Management

Posted at 10:00 AM ET

Alex Bernhardt, Assistant Vice President
Contact

Risk, if left unmanaged by people with low incomes, may render their attempts to exit poverty more difficult. It may also increase the likelihood of a return or new entrance to poverty for those who hover just above the poverty line (see previous posting), and may increase the chances of personal loan default for the minority of low-income individuals with current access to microcredit (small value loans usually provided to help the entrepreneurial poor to develop microenterprises).

Continue reading…

April 16th, 2010

Week’s Top Stories: Apr 10 - 16, 2010

Posted at 9:00 AM ET

Catastrophe Bond Update: First Quarter 2010: Heavy Smoke, Some Fire: Encouraging Conditions Persist*:    In the first quarter of 2010, two catastrophe bond transactions were completed, and USD300 million of risk capital was issued. In response to strong investor demand, both transactions closed within initial price guidance and were upsized relative to announced placement targets. While this activity furthers the integration of the capital markets into the risk management processes of protection buyers, on balance, issuance volumes for the quarter were perhaps a bit lighter than expected at the close of 2009.

Read the article »

Chart: Insurance Linked Securities Issuance, by Peril, 1997 Through April 1, 2010*:    On a standalone basis, the two most frequently securitized perils are U.S. hurricane USD (7.08 billion) and U.S. earthquake (USD 4.71 billion). Other perils securitized on a standalone basis include European windstorm, Japanese earthquake and, to a lesser extent, Japanese typhoon. Multi-peril transactions, in which the same dollar of risk principal is exposed to at least two or more perils accounts for 42 percent of total risk principal issued. Insurance linked securities (ILS) investors typically prefer single-peril / single-zone transactions as they provide greater ability to construct granular portfolios according to each investor’s risk preferences. ILS sponsors however, particularly large national and global writers with aggregate concerns across multiple perils and geographic zones, often prefer to economize risk transfer spend by applying a single limit across different non-correlated perils, for example U.S. hurricane and earthquake.

Read the article »

Solvency II in Depth:      Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC sponsored this extended roundtable discussion that considered the progress made by (re)insurance as the Solvency II regime approaches. Held in London, it was attended by a number of UK and continental Europe industry leaders, including Guy Carpenter Managing Director and European Solutions Group Leader Eric Paire. We present the text of the roundtable discussion here as it appeared in Reinsurance Magazine.

Read the article »

Reserve Risk and Future Inflation:      The last bout of serious inflation in the United States occurred in the late 1970s. In casualty insurance, high inflation coincided with deteriorating reserves and underwriting results. Many believe that the risk of future inflation is higher than it has been in many years. If rising inflation levels impact settlement of claims that are open or are currently unreported, then increased inflation risk leads to increased reserve risk.

Read the article »

Reserve Uncertainty Interferes with Raising Capital:      Guy Carpenter’s Firm-Value Risk Modeling (FVRM) approach, described in two previous GCCapitalIdeas.com articles, takes Dynamic Financial Analysis (DFA) a step beyond existing techniques by modeling the impact of risk on the shareholder value of the (re)insurer. This puts the two dimensions of DFA - risk and reward - on the same scale: value. The output of an FVRM analysis is the M-curve, that relates the (re)insurer’s book value (surplus) to its market (shareholder) value. When the (re)insurer is in financial distress, with insufficient surplus to cover its risks adequately, its market value reflects the possibility of imminent liquidation, and will typically be not much greater than book value. On the other hand, when the (re)insurer holds a generous capital buffer, its market value reflects a going-concern potential to generate a stream of profits and dividends, and will include some franchise value above and beyond its book value. There is a point, however, where the (re)insurer has so much capital that adding more does nothing to enhance its franchise value.

Read the article »

Most Popular Keyword:   risk management and firm value

And, you may have missed…

A Survey of Capital Allocation Metrics: Illustration:   To understand the differences in proportional capital allocation methods, it helps to have a reference point. Consider a simple hypothetical insurer that writes auto, general liability, workers’ compensation and property business. The loss distributions are a bit exaggerated to highlight some of the differences among metrics. A profile of the company’s business is shown in Figure 1.

Read the article »

*Securities or investments, as applicable, are offered in the United States through GC Securities, a division of MMC Securities Corp., a US registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC. Main Office: 1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036. Phone: (212) 345-5000. Securities or investments, as applicable, are offered in the European Union by GC Securities, a division of MMC Securities (Europe) Ltd., which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Reinsurance products are placed through qualified affiliates of Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC. MMC Securities Corp., MMC Securities (Europe) Ltd. and Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC are affiliates owned by Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. This communication is not intended as an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any security, financial instrument, reinsurance or insurance product.

April 15th, 2010

Solvency II - Approval of Internal Models: Article Link Index

Posted at 12:00 PM ET

The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) published many consultation papers in 2009 focusing on Level 2 implementation measures for Solvency II. Consultation Paper (CP) 37 addressed the procedures for approval of internal models. It was followed by a final paper entitled “CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II ‘The procedure to be followed for the approval of an internal model’”, published in October, 2009.

This series reviews the implementation measures described in the final papers. Implementation measures for the use of partial internal models are briefly described in these two CEIOPS papers. A separate consultation paper, CP 65, proposed specific implementation measures for approval of a partial internal model when it is used in conjunction with the Solvency II Standard Formula. Those specific implementation measures will be covered in a future briefing.

  
Solvency II - Approval of Internal Models:  Part I: Introduction & Prerequisites for Approval >>

Solvency II - Approval of Internal Models:  Part II: The Approval Process >>

Solvency II - Approval of Internal Models:   Part III: The Approval Timeline, Approach for Group Internal Models & Conclusions >>

Solvency II - Approval of Internal Models:  Part IV:  Appendices >> 

 

Click here to read additional material about Solvency II >> 

 

Click here to register for e-mail updates >>

April 15th, 2010

Chart: Japanese Windstorm Catastrophe Excess of Loss: Market Capacity & Pricing

Posted at 10:00 AM ET

japanese-windstorm-cat-72dpibig

At the April 1, 2010 renewals, lead reinsurers were fairly firm in the first round of quotations and buyers were made to work hard for reductions. After several rounds of negotiation, firm orders were generally set at modest reductions over 2009 pricing within a range of down 2.5 percent to down 6 percent on a risk adjusted basis, with an average reduction of approximately 4.5 percent. The market that resulted was tight and price sensitive. Reinsurers were willing to cut lines if reductions were seen as too great or in cases where they perceived pricing was already competitive.

Click here to register for e-mail updates »

April 15th, 2010

April 1, 2010 Reinsurance Renewal Article Link Index

Posted at 10:00 AM ET

April 1 Reinsurance Renewals: Rates Lower; Returns Under Pressure »

US Workers Compensation Renewals at April 1, 2010 »

April 1 Renewals: US Life and Accident & Health »

 

Register to have GC Capital Ideas insights delivered directly to your inbox »

April 14th, 2010

Reserve Risk and Future Inflation

Posted at 10:00 AM ET

Spencer Gluck, Senior Vice President
Contact

The last bout of serious inflation in the United States occurred in the late 1970s. In casualty insurance, high inflation coincided with deteriorating reserves and underwriting results. Many believe that the risk of future inflation is higher than it has been in many years. If rising inflation levels impact settlement of claims that are open or are currently unreported, then increased inflation risk leads to increased reserve risk.

Continue reading…

April 14th, 2010

Earthquake in China

Posted at 9:13 AM ET

qinghai-earthquakesmallA powerful earthquake hit a remote region in western China at 23:49 UTC on  April 13 (07:49 on  April 14 local time), destroying buildings, damaging infrastructure and killing at least 400 people. The earthquake, measuring 6.9 Mw, was located between China’s Qinghai Province and the Tibet Autonomous Region, some 28 miles (45 kilometers) northwest of Yushu and 235 miles (375 kilometers) south-southeast of Golmud, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The USGS added that the quake had a shallow depth of 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) and it was the strongest earthquake to hit the region since 1976. At least 18 aftershocks have hit the area since the main earthquake, the most powerful at 5.8 Mw.

Continue reading…