Posts Tagged ‘Capital Requirements’



December 10th, 2018

Cost of Capital and its Use in Valuing Reinsurance

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Increasingly, reinsurance is seen as an important element of capital management. Reinsurance decisions are moving away from the reinsurance buyer and towards the finance teams. These teams need to find a way of comparing reinsurance in a straightforward way. Defining the cost of capital for reinsurance means that it can be compared with other capital sources.

Continue reading…

October 30th, 2018

The Transformation of Australian and New Zealand life insurance - GC@SIRC Commentary

Posted at 8:00 PM ET

matthew_rose_01Matthew Rose, Managing Director

Contact

  • Foreign companies are seeking the long-term growth opportunities that the Australian market offers
  • Insurers are gaining understanding of the significance of efficient and dynamic restructuring of their capital
  • Regular discussions ensure that covers are properly structured to reflect current risk/capital needs

Continue reading…

December 4th, 2017

Critical Tool for Making Strategic Enterprise Risk Management Decisions

Posted at 2:43 PM ET

hettinger_cropped-smThomas Hettinger, Managing Director, Strategic Advisory

Contact

  • There are indications that new A.M. Best Stochastic Based BCAR factor assignments may require more capital for companies entering a new line of business than for established writers growing in that line
  • Companies will be under extra pressure to choose growth strategies carefully because of potential capital pressures from A.M. Best and their potential for low returns due to the extended soft positions of many markets
  • With current capital positions evaluated, robust and current market insight is critical to accurately assess potential growth areas

Continue reading…

November 8th, 2017

Insurers Adapting in a Time of Disruption

Posted at 4:00 AM ET

Here we review recent GC Capital Ideas posts on strategies insurers may utilize to continue to achieve growth in a disruptive environment.

Continue reading…

October 17th, 2017

Integrating Growth and Enterprise Risk Management - GC@PCI Commentary

Posted at 8:30 AM ET

hettinger_cropped-smThomas Hettinger, Managing Director, Strategic Advisory

Contact

  • There are indications that new A.M. Best Stochastic Based BCAR factor assignments may require more capital for companies entering a new line of business than for established writers growing in that line
  • Companies will be under extra pressure to choose growth strategies carefully because of potential capital pressures from A.M. Best and their potential for low returns due to the extended soft positions of many markets
  • With current capital positions evaluated, robust and current market insight is critical to accurately assess potential growth areas

Continue reading…

March 7th, 2017

Solvency II: Greater Risk-Driven Management: Part III: Risk Management and Risk Profile

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-95eagle_matthew-smeddy-vanbeneden-sm21 Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Matthew Eagle, Head of GC Analytics - International and Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director

Contact

With the transition from Solvency I to Solvency II, insurers have to contend with a more complex and comprehensive risk management framework than just premiums and reserves. This new framework encompasses the full range of risks exposing a (re)insurance portfolio, including an examination of existing risk mitigation frameworks.

Continue reading…

February 22nd, 2017

Solvency II Equivalence In The International (Re)insurance Landscape: Part IV: Asia Pacific Solvency II Equivalence

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-953graham-jones-102x1173lobel_myra-sm-1174eddy-vanbeneden-sm-1175sumner-sm-1173Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Graham Jones, Senior Vice President; Myra E. Lobel, Managing Director; Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director and Steven Sumner, Oliver Wyman, Actuarial Consulting

Contact

Solvency II’s reach and influence extends to Asia Pacific, as Japan and Australia attained provisional third country equivalence status for Group Solvency (Article 227). This status is valid for ten years and reduces the administrative burden for the Solvency II calculation of subsidiaries in the European Economic Area (EEA).

Continue reading…

February 21st, 2017

Solvency II Equivalence In The International (Re)insurance Landscape: Part III: The US and Solvency II Equivalency

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-952graham-jones-102x1172lobel_myra-sm-1172eddy-vanbeneden-sm-1172sumner-sm-1172Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Graham Jones, Senior Vice President; Myra E. Lobel, Managing Director; Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director and Steven Sumner, Oliver Wyman, Actuarial Consulting

Contact

Separate but related negotiations continue between the EC, European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, and in the United States, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and the Federal Insurance Office (FIO).

Continue reading…

February 20th, 2017

Solvency II Equivalence In The International (Re)insurance Landscape: Part II

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-951graham-jones-102x1171lobel_myra-sm-1171eddy-vanbeneden-sm-1171sumner-sm-1171Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Graham Jones, Senior Vice President; Myra E. Lobel, Managing Director; Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director and Steven Sumner, Oliver Wyman, Actuarial Consulting

Contact

The Solvency II Directive sets out three distinct areas for equivalence:

  1. Reinsurance
  2. Group Solvency
  3. Group Supervision

Continue reading…