Posts Tagged ‘Europe’



March 16th, 2017

Cat Modelling Challenges in Europe: Part IV

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

weatherhead_mark-sm3Mark Weatherhead, Head of Model Development - International

Contact

Flood poses particular challenges for modelling. In particular, the hydraulic modelling of flood extents requires a high-quality digital terrain model that has been processed specifically for the task by removing features like bridges.

Continue reading…

March 15th, 2017

Cat Modelling Challenges in Europe: Part III

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

weatherhead_mark-sm2Mark Weatherhead, Head of Model Development - International

Contact

There are two main lines of development. First, (re)insurers need to gain a deeper understanding of how the existing commercial vendor models perform for their book of business, how the models can be best modified or customized to better reflect their own loss history, and how the models compare to each other. Second, (re)insurers need to continue to address gaps in knowledge that are not adequately covered by existing models.

Continue reading…

March 14th, 2017

Cat Modelling Challenges in Europe: Part II

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

weatherhead_mark-sm1Mark Weatherhead, Head of Model Development - International

Contact

While there is still uncertainty regarding the degree of impact from climate change, the likely consequences are subject to modelling. Increasing global temperatures are projected to impact the mid-latitude and polar regions more than the tropics.

Continue reading…

March 13th, 2017

Cat Modelling Challenges in Europe: Part I

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

weatherhead_mark-smMark Weatherhead, Head of Model Development - International

Contact

2016 marked the 60th year of the Monte Carlo Rendez-Vous. Since the first event in 1957 the insurance world has changed significantly, with economic and insured losses from natural catastrophes such as floods and hurricanes increasing dramatically.

Continue reading…

March 7th, 2017

Solvency II: Greater Risk-Driven Management: Part III: Risk Management and Risk Profile

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-95eagle_matthew-smeddy-vanbeneden-sm21 Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Matthew Eagle, Head of GC Analytics - International and Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director

Contact

With the transition from Solvency I to Solvency II, insurers have to contend with a more complex and comprehensive risk management framework than just premiums and reserves. This new framework encompasses the full range of risks exposing a (re)insurance portfolio, including an examination of existing risk mitigation frameworks.

Continue reading…

March 6th, 2017

Solvency II: Greater Risk-Driven Management: Part II: Volatility

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-95eagle_matthew-smeddy-vanbeneden-sm21 Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Matthew Eagle, Head of GC Analytics - International and Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director

Contact

Another shortcoming of a single ratio is that it provides no insight into the resilience of an entity’s capital position. This became relevant when market volatility spiked in the first quarter of 2016 and companies disclosed how much their Solvency II ratios fell in the period.

Continue reading…

March 2nd, 2017

Solvency II: Greater Risk-Driven Management: Part I

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-95eagle_matthew-smeddy-vanbeneden-sm21 Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Matthew Eagle, Head of GC Analytics - International and Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director

Contact

On January 1, 2016, the Solvency II regulatory regime took effect. Some celebrated; others were weary from the months and years of preparation.

Continue reading…

February 27th, 2017

Managing Volatility Key To Solvency II Transition: Part II

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

paire-eric-sm1Eric Paire, Head of Global Partners & Strategic Advisory, EMEA

Contact

“To remain competitive, smaller companies simply cannot afford to operate at 200 percent. This volatility on multiple fronts means that establishing the solvency level that will provide a sufficiently robust capital buffer to withstand these fluctuations is extremely difficult. Is it 130 percent, 150 percent, 170 percent or higher?” notes Eric Paire, Head of Global Partners & Strategic Advisory, EMEA at Guy Carpenter.

Continue reading…

February 23rd, 2017

Managing Volatility Key To Solvency II Transition: Part I

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

paire-eric-smEric Paire, Head of Global Partners & Strategic Advisory, EMEA

Contact

Movement Within Capital Ratios Leading to Uncertainty Amongst Mid-Size Companies

The impact of the Solvency II capital ratio on composite life and property/casualty balance sheets is proving more substantial than some companies initially expected, according to Eric Paire, Head of Global Partners & Strategic Advisory, EMEA at Guy Carpenter. This development is due to the double impact of market volatility and volatility within the solvency ratio itself.

Continue reading…

February 21st, 2017

Solvency II Equivalence In The International (Re)insurance Landscape: Part III: The US and Solvency II Equivalency

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

andrew-cox-952graham-jones-102x1172lobel_myra-sm-1172eddy-vanbeneden-sm-1172sumner-sm-1172Andrew Cox, Managing Director; Graham Jones, Senior Vice President; Myra E. Lobel, Managing Director; Eddy Vanbeneden, Managing Director and Steven Sumner, Oliver Wyman, Actuarial Consulting

Contact

Separate but related negotiations continue between the EC, European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, and in the United States, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and the Federal Insurance Office (FIO).

Continue reading…