Posts Tagged ‘RBC’



February 3rd, 2016

Solvency Regimes: Third-Country Equivalence

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Current capital requirements in the United States are set at a legal-entity level. Yet there are currently no global requirements for companies that operate in more than one country, and calculation formulas for capital requirements typically vary in each jurisdiction. Solvency II is the closest to mandating a group standard. Solvency II uses the concept of “equivalence” to deal with differing capital regimes between the European Union and the rest of the world including the United States, instead of forcing Solvency II standards on a third country.

Continue reading…

January 25th, 2016

Developments in Asia Pacific: Indonesia

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

The average balance of payments in Indonesian reinsurance transactions over the past five years has been in a deficit of IDR5.65 trillion (USD455 million) per year. This has been a point of frustration for the Indonesian government. As such, the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK) has instructed insurers to retain more risk and to reinsure more business with domestic reinsurers, including the recently-formed state reinsurer, Indonesia Re, to “improve and optimize capacity in the country.” The OJK has also encouraged all domestic reinsurers to obtain an international rating in order to improve competitiveness with foreign reinsurers. However, it is anticipated that high cessions to other unrated, domestic companies will increase credit risk charges and pressure capital adequacy ratios.

Continue reading…

January 20th, 2016

Developments in Asia Pacific: Overview, Part II

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Other countries, such as the Philippines and Indonesia, have instituted rules that may, conversely, impede the development of a healthy, profitable insurance market. The Indonesian regulator’s recent steps to reduce capital outflows, with a focus on reinsurance premiums ceded to international reinsurers, remain highly debated and will be explored in greater detail later. The Philippines, in addition to a risk-based capital (RBC) framework, has instituted a minimum paid-up capital requirement (starting in 2006 and revised in 2013) that increases every two years and will result in a PHP2 billion (approximately USD44 million) minimum threshold in 2020. This will put minimum capital levels in the Philippines well above those of more developed markets, including Australia, Japan and Singapore. The policy applies uniformly across the industry regardless of premium volume, line of business or geographic scope and therefore its impact is more strongly felt by smaller carriers that will most likely be forced out of the market or into the arms of larger players. The Philippines Insurer and Reinsurer Association (PIRA) has been outspoken against the minimum capital requirement and stated a preference for a standalone RBC metric.

Continue reading…

January 19th, 2016

Developments in Asia Pacific: Overview, Part I

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Asia Pacific is a diverse mix of countries encompassing nearly one-third of the earth’s landmass and more than one half of its population. Given the broad spectrum of economic and regulatory sophistication across the region, the approach to insurance regulation has varied on a country-by-country basis as each regime adapts solvency principles to their own needs and political realities.

Continue reading…

November 2nd, 2015

Guy Carpenter Report Evaluates (Re)Insurance Regulatory Advancement in the Asia Pacific Region

Posted at 3:30 PM ET

Guy Carpenter today published an assessment of the development of solvency requirements and regulatory initiatives that are impacting (re)insurers in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region. According to the report, these developments are driven by four key motivators, including the need to improve resiliency post-catastrophic loss; to increase oversight in a post-Great Recession world; to follow best practices from the banking and international insurance sectors; and finally, to satisfy domestic political pressures.

Continue reading…

September 15th, 2015

Global Regulatory Change for the (Re)insurance Industry

Posted at 10:30 PM ET

wrynn-95mark-shumway-95graham-jones-95andrew-cox-95markus-mueller-95-2015James Wrynn, Mark Shumway, Managing Directors and Graham Jones, Andrew Cox and Markus Mueller, Senior Vice Presidents 

Contact 

In the wake of the global financial crisis in 2008, significant regulatory change aimed at preventing/mitigating future crises was implemented. While the U.S. insurance regulatory framework did remarkably well in the protection of insurance consumers and companies in the United States during the financial crisis, it was, and will be affected by these reforms. Today, the results are having a profound impact on companies’ balance sheets and risk management practices. Although primarily aimed at larger, global insurers, the changes are so extensive that they may impact medium and small insurers to some extent. The question that most (re)insurers are asking today is how can they cope with the myriad regulatory, legislative and ratings changes and continue to maximize opportunities and maintain profitable growth. 

Continue reading…

September 14th, 2014

Capital Optimization: Using Internal Reinsurance for Group Capital Management

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

markus-muller-124Markus Müller, Global Partners & Strategic Advisory EMEA, Capital Optimization

Contact 

Increased capital efficiency remains at the forefront of (re)insurers’ strategies - owing largely to the pending introduction of the Solvency II regime, rating agency capital requirements and the continued pressure around shareholder expectations.

Continue reading…

October 21st, 2013

Increasing Strategic Advisory Needs of Large European Insurers and Reinsurers

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

paire_eric_thumbEric Paire, Head of Global Partners & Strategic Development EMEA

Contact

Major European international insurance companies face common challenges, issues and external constraints on their way to profitable growth. How can external strategic advice help through the process?

Continue reading…

June 18th, 2013

Chart: RBC Ratio to BCAR

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

In Figure 1, RBC Ratio is defined as the ratio of aggregate Total Adjusted Capital to Authorized Control Level RBC for each of 111 combined insurance groups. Plotted against BCAR, there is clearly a strong correlation between the measures, though the relationship is not perfect.

Continue reading…

April 4th, 2013

What About the “S” in ORSA? Actuaries Raise Their Hands: Part II

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Micah Woolstenhulme, Senior Vice President
Contact

This post is Part II of an earlier post that reviewed a session held at the Casualty Actuarial Society Annual Meeting.  In that session, attendees hypothetically viewed the P&C industry as a single large company. Audience members were shareholders and session panelists adopted various executive and leadership roles in the company. The meeting’s task was to vet an economic capital model before the board of directors, allowing individual shareholders the freedom to openly question the model’s input and results. This model, if properly developed and embedded into the company’s strategic management, would represent a key component of the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Summary Report that will be required of large companies in the industry as early as 2015. Along the way, the presentation and board discussion were interrupted to poll the audience members on several interesting questions.

Continue reading…