Posts Tagged ‘solvency’



May 7th, 2015

Reinsurance Versus Subordinate Debt: Which is Best for Solvency Capital?

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

matt-day-headshot-sm5ross-milburn-pic-128x149smallMatthew Day, Senior Vice President, Guy Carpenter Strategic Advisory and Ross Milburn, Managing Director, GC Securities*, a division of MMC Securities (Europe) Ltd., which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

Contact

Here we review how a holistic approach to managing solvency capital requirements can benefit insurers’ bottom line: 

Continue reading…

April 30th, 2015

Reinsurance Versus Subordinate Debt: Which Is Best for Solvency Capital? Part III

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

matt-day-headshot-sm7ross-milburn-pic-128x149small2Matthew Day, Senior Vice President, Guy Carpenter Strategic Advisory and Ross Milburn, Managing Director,  GC Securities*, a division of MMC Securities (Europe) Ltd., which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

Contact

What About Volatility?

Insurers understand volatility in respect of their insurance and investment risk and reinsurance can play a significant role in controlling this. However, another form of volatility exists in respect of the pricing and availability of reinsurance and sub debt. To counter this clients are encouraged to consider multi-year reinsurance transactions, retroactive solutions and to explore sub debt issuance that by nature is long term. By staggering the end-dates of different transactions, a natural hedge against rising rates on line and debt market spreads can be created.

Continue reading…

April 29th, 2015

Reinsurance Versus Subordinate Debt: Which Is Best for Solvency Capital? Part II

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

matt-day-headshot-sm6ross-milburn-pic-128x149small1Matthew Day, Senior Vice President, Guy Carpenter Strategic Advisory and Ross Milburn, Managing Director,  GC Securities*, a division of MMC Securities (Europe) Ltd., which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

Contact

Increasing the Permanent Capital Available

Sub debt is an additional part of the capital tool kit available to insurers and can often be used to greater effect as part of a tailored solution than in isolation. In conjunction with a risk and/or capital management-based approach to the mitigation of each of the solvency capital requirement (SCR) components, management may consider issuing sub debt to provide growth capital (organic and through acquisition) as well as make a longer term contribution to SCR coverage.

Continue reading…

April 28th, 2015

Reinsurance Versus Subordinate Debt: Which Is Best for Solvency Capital? Part I

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

matt-day-headshot-sm5ross-milburn-pic-128x149smallMatthew Day, Senior Vice President, Guy Carpenter Strategic Advisory and Ross Milburn, Managing Director,  GC Securities*, a division of MMC Securities (Europe) Ltd., which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

Contact 

In recent months a number of market commentators have opined on the merits of proportional reinsurance versus subordinated debt (sub debt), some favoring reinsurance solutions and some favoring sub debt, but generally finding results in line with the products their companies offered. Guy Carpenter feels reinsurance or sub debt alone is unlikely to provide the best solution to meet solvency capital requirements. Instead, a blended approach should be considered.

Continue reading…

March 19th, 2015

Modeling Beyond Property CAT Risk

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Here we review recent GC Capital Idea stories on catastrophe models that focus on exposures beyond catastrophe property risk:

Continue reading…

March 16th, 2015

Guy Carpenter Launches its Innovative Casualty Catastrophe Model: GC ForCas℠

Posted at 5:30 AM ET

Guy Carpenter today announced the launch of GC ForCas℠, its new data-driven casualty catastrophe model.

Continue reading…

January 27th, 2015

GC Videocast - Introduction to Holistic Balance Sheet Management

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

A holistic approach that optimizes the use of the two traditionally separate areas of balance sheet management within the current market environment has proven to be extremely challenging for non-life insurers. The key issue for non-life insurers is how to boost return on capital in a continuing low-yield environment. In the first of the Holistic Balance Sheet Management series, Andrew Cox, Capital Optimization, Guy Carpenter, and Niall Clifford, Financial Strategy Group, Mercer, discuss how insurance companies may optimize their capital while addressing their concerns over economic capital, earnings risk, ratings agency requirements and increasing constraints due to Solvency II.

Continue reading…

January 26th, 2015

Holistic Balance Sheet Management: Ensuring Added Value; Introduction to Videocast Series

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

A holistic approach that optimizes the use of the two traditionally separate areas of balance sheet management (reinsurance and investment strategy) can make a significant difference to (re)insurers’ financial results. (Re)insurers should seek to address both the asset and liability sides of the balance sheet in an integrated manner.

Continue reading…

December 16th, 2014

Impact on Results

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

To consider the impact that these cycles may have on the financial statements and solvency positions of insurers there has to be an understanding of the magnitude of any change in ultimate loss and the likely timing of the recognition of that change. The profit or loss in any financial year is a combination of the profit and loss from that accident year and also any recognized changes in the reserves from prior years.

Continue reading…

December 3rd, 2014

Casualty Catastrophe Risk Modeling: Part I

Posted at 1:00 AM ET

Casualty (or liability based) catastrophes have become increasingly frequent and severe over the past decade, exposing (re)insurers to much more risk than they may have realized and reserved for. One root cause can trigger a chain reaction that can bleed balance sheets and even imperil solvency. Until recently, casualty carriers had little choice but to accept this risk as losses emerged.

Continue reading…